|
Mr J Cracken
Regional Director
Environment Agency
Richard Fairclough House
Knutsford Road
Warrington
WA4 1HG
Dear Sir,
North West Regional Fisheries Byelaws
I wish to object to the proposed amendments
to the above, specifically to Section 1 of Byelaw 18 which seeks
to prohibit the use of any dead or alive freshwater fish, salmonids
or eels as bait, or to possess any of these with the intention
of using them for bait. This would place severe and quite unreasonable
restrictions on the lawful activities of predator anglers, activities
which represent no environmental threat whatsoever.
The use of both live and dead fish for
bait are established, legal angling methods.
- If it is acceptable to use minnows for
bait in rivers and streams (Byelaw 18, Section 3(a), assuming
that they are caught from the venue being fished, then there
is no reason why it should not be acceptable to use those resident
species which are readily available on the 14 waters listed in
Section 1 (a) for bait (either live or dead).
- There appear to be no documented instances
of British freshwater fisheries where the capture and removal
of fish for bait has caused significant depletion of the fish
populations.
- There has never been a single documented
case where the use of live fish baits has resulted in the spread
of diseases or parasites.
- There is no evidence to suggest that the
introduction of dead fish baits poses any realistic threat in
relation to the spread of diseases or parasites.
- The Environment Agency is at liberty to
exercise its existing powers in declining to issue Sec. 30 Consent
for the introduction of live fish for bait in the 14 lakes listed.
- The Environment Agency should consider
the prohibition of the use, or possession of rare species (vendace,
arctic char and schelly) for bait.
Yours faithfully
(signed)
print name :
address :
|